Repeating a statement already made doesn’t change its value though? And this is a statement that still needs to be made apparently, most people still seem to think your clothes need to comply with their ancient ideas about what is “masculine”.
I don’t agree. It doesn’t “still need to be made”. Nobody cares what models wear on the catwalk. It is a gesture from insiders in the industry to other insiders in the industry.
Considering our bodies, wouldn’t dresses/skirts actually be more appropriate for males and pants for girls?
This reminds me of the blue — pink “argument” for boys and girls:
“a June 1918 article from the trade publication Earnshaw’s Infants’ Department wrote, “The generally accepted rule is pink for the boys, and blue for the girls. The reason is that pink, being a more decided and stronger color, is more suitable for the boy, while blue, which is more delicate and dainty, is prettier for the girl.” Other sources said blue was flattering for blonds, pink for brunettes; or blue was for blue-eyed babies, pink for brown-eyed babies, according to Paoletti.”
Comments 8
it might be general model aloofness but they don’t seem happy to be in the situation
I think I’ll give it a miss myself.
I find it silly. Making a statement that has been made a thousand times already.
Repeating a statement already made doesn’t change its value though? And this is a statement that still needs to be made apparently, most people still seem to think your clothes need to comply with their ancient ideas about what is “masculine”.
I don’t agree. It doesn’t “still need to be made”. Nobody cares what models wear on the catwalk. It is a gesture from insiders in the industry to other insiders in the industry.
However questionable the motive, the look ONLY works if you are an impossibly skinny model. Heaven forbid those fashions reach the the general public.
Considering our bodies, wouldn’t dresses/skirts actually be more appropriate for males and pants for girls?
This reminds me of the blue — pink “argument” for boys and girls:
“a June 1918 article from the trade publication Earnshaw’s Infants’ Department wrote, “The generally accepted rule is pink for the boys, and blue for the girls. The reason is that pink, being a more decided and stronger color, is more suitable for the boy, while blue, which is more delicate and dainty, is prettier for the girl.” Other sources said blue was flattering for blonds, pink for brunettes; or blue was for blue-eyed babies, pink for brown-eyed babies, according to Paoletti.”
I just came here to enjoy all the pretty boys y’all can bitch about politics if that’s what your into