Comments 23

    1. Spain:
      “Nice body but he could be much cuter”

      How do you know he’s not? Can hardly see his face. Could be very cute.

      My only problem is the unnecessary dual-layer of shorts.

    1. “A skinny young boy who needs a good meal inside him.”
      And what exactly is a “good meal” to you? Burger, fries and coke?

  1. Wearing baggy shorts and double layers is likely the only way youngsters can try to insulate themselves from the endless, crass and slimy comments made on this blog regarding pics of really cute and wonderful boys to behold.

    1. @OhCreeps (soon to be OhI’mSTUPID):
      “Wearing baggy shorts and double layers is likely the only way youngsters can try to insulate themselves from the endless, crass and slimy comments made on this blog …”

      So ….. you’re saying that all boys that wear “baggy shorts and double layers” just know they’re pics are going to end up on this blog so that’s why they wear them at the beach, etc all over the world.

      You’re sense of “logic” is so stupid ….. wait, no, it’s just like a religious way of thinking.

  2. Well said and your right that a lot of these boys wear boxers or briefs under their shorts for a reason. It also stops the perves at the beach who take their photos from seeing their junk and then posting it on their blogs.

    It is up to them what they wear at the beach and not for us to decide.

    1. @Mathew:
      “It also stops the perves at the beach who take their photos from seeing their junk and then posting it on their blogs.”

      So, you’re saying that Sinal is nothing but a pervert because he has taken so many pics (including this one) of teens at beaches/seas/swimming pools/outside in general?

      And, as for “It also stops the perves” ….. well, that double-layer of materials didn’t stop this photo (and thousands of others by him and others) from being taken and shown.

      So, you are a perv as well because you clicked on the image/thread name to see the image and make a comment in here as well?

      .

      “It is up to them what they wear at the beach and not for us to decide.”

      No one is trying to say it’s not up to them — we’re just making comments and opinions about the matter.

      By the way, just how many of you flatly ignore when girls are photographed in similar ways and locations — both, teens who are developing/have devoloped breasts and possibly younger girls who are photographed to show their bottoms?

      Men, teens, boys, women, teens, girls have always been photographed and will always be photographed in these ways as long as there is any kind of “appearance and sexual desire.”

      1. “By the way, just how many of you flatly ignore when girls are photographed in similar ways and locations — both, teens who are developing/have devoloped breasts and possibly younger girls who are photographed to show their bottoms?…”

        EXACTLY. Some people seem to have this double standard. Perfectly okay to photo and comment on young ladies, but when it comes to young men, then it’s considered perverted and sick? Screw that!

        If you are out in public, you are fair game to be observed, photographed or commented on, REGARDLESS OF WHO YOU ARE. It’s basic human nature, so get over it and stop being so judgmental.

    2. Also, I wasn’t the first to comment about the “dual layer” …… Chunky was the first to imply this by an hour.

  3. Being new to this blog, I am curious to know if Penboy is the resident critic?

    Is he like a moderator or something?

  4. Nopes…
    He’s the antithesis of moderate…
    Virulently against religion…..
    A pedant opposing decorum in life…..

    Him and daveboy are but harmless noise if you care to not take them seriously

    1. Oh.

      OK.

      I was just wondering, because it seems like he has a running commentary of almost EVERY post, and I thought perhaps he was a “honcho” of some kind.

      thanks.

  5. @al bendova:

    You just used up 54 of your allotted 75 words per thread worring about … me. You really should consider using your allotted words for your opinion of the thread title/image/video instead of worring about other commenters.

    .

    @upi:
    “Him and daveboy are but harmless noise if you care to not take them seriously”

    Actually, it’s daveboy, [“old”] Dan and myself who willingly offer up the rare reason and truth about many of the threads in here … which also happen to be about/with religion.

    Considering how much [actually, how LITTLE] you offer up for the blog, We’d regard you but harmless noise since there’s no reason to take you seriously. :-)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *