Periodical Political Post *23

milkboys News 13 Comments

Queer News

Other News

Comments 13

  1. Pity about Egypt. It is ironic that the punitive approach toward adult homosexuality in Levantine, middle eastern, and central asian countries is imported from Britain, and had little to do with local attitudes. After all that intervention, what did Britain leave these countries with? Less oil, and executions for homosexual sex.

    Egypt used to have adult cross-dressing male dancers, who went by a special name and had sex with masculine men. Not to mention that boys tended to have their first sexual experiences with older boys and adult men, until only recently. If the British has just let it well enough alone, or had not influenced other societies, things would be much more harmonious over there.

    1. I think you are talking out of your aris, to put it mildly. The driving force behind the antipathy towards homosexuals is religion and in these areas it is predominantly the religion of peace. 1836 was the last time anyone was hung for buggery by the British, so what ever is happening nearly 200 years later is totally unconnected to that.
      Great Britain and France temporarily occupied the Levant and Middle East post WW1 and no anti-gay witch hunts were conducted in that period.
      The nearest The British Empire got to Central Asia was Afghanistan, where the boy dancers were let alone and indeed still flourish there.

      Victorian England was no more prudish than anywhere else of the era, if you believe the stories about erotic table legs that just shows how gullible you are. Queen Vic was after all a very sexual woman, whilst Albert was alive, she had 9 kids and none of them were virgin births. This started a fashion for extremely large families, My maternal G.G Grandparents both had 11 children and didn’t even have the excuse of being R.C. London had a large prostitute community, Jack The Ripper didn’t kill all of them.
      English Boarding Schools are notorious for being hotbeds of homosexuality and most of the leaders of Empire went to boarding school.

      Morocco was a favourite place to go for a dusky boy or two until the rise of fascist islam.
      No one has ever been thrown off a roof or stoned to death under British jurisprudence, this is all down to the mad mullahs.

      We don’t have mall police checking people’s gender before they use a public convenience.

      1. You want to say that because of the English boarding schools, or because Queen Victoria had lots of children, that the British liked what they saw when they arrived in these places and saw eroticism between men and boys? The historical record is against you on that.

        The turning tide against homosexuality in all those places is heavily correlated with colonialization and merchant influence, in the 19th and early 20th centuries. Think it is a total coincidence that boy dancing survived in Afghanistan, where the British didn’t make it, but was wiped out everywhere else? And one other major country not colonialized, Thailand, still allows within the culture for man-boy eroticism as well as transgender males, think that’s a coincidence as well?

        The British (with the French, Russians, etc.) introduced anxiety about all forms of homosexuality to all of those countries they touched or did business with. They influenced the elites as well as introduced “sodomy” laws after WW1. In a short time, a rich tradition of man-boy eroticism, as well as acceptance of cross-dressing adult males, was erased. They had the same effect in India and China.

        As for the rise of fascist Islam, are you referring to the parts of it that were US and UK funded? Or the parts that were a direct backlash against western interference?

  2. FAROE ISLANDS & COLOMBIA > Marching on.
    EGYPT > Bad Muslims want to kill us all. Good Muslims just want Bad Muslims to kill us all.
    GOING POTTY > If boys using the girls’ restroom look the part, and girls using the boys’ restroom look the part, nobody will notice or care. Both facilities offer booths for privacy. The problem would only appear when some dude decides on a whim he’s in touch with his feminine side and ventures in where he shouldn’t. Hopefully, a very rare occurrence. Locker rooms are different. People undress publicly, shower together, dry off and get dressed in an open area. Full frontal en masse. Despite signs saying you can’t, guys often hang out naked in saunas and steam rooms. What could possibly go wrong…
    RUSSIA > Anti-gay ‘propaganda’ laws are incredibly stupid – kinda like most gun control laws over here. Anyway, I’m sure if the Neo-Nazis were waving gay flags and carrying gay banners and posters, the St. Petersburg police would have roughed them up and hauled them away as well. If you’re Russian and gay, shut up about it. They don’t usually bother you if you’re closeted, but you come out at your own risk. Sad. I have an idea: what if the gay people in Russia come up with a whole secret code based on an existing respected institution. What if they use Russian Orthodox icons as gay insignia, assigning a special inside meaning to each saint. Gays could parade with church banners and icon posters. The public would smile approvingly, the LGBT community would get it – and when the police finally figured it out they’d look like real chumps. Who knows – by then Putin might be gone anyway.
    FBI SCANDAL > It hasn’t been the same since J. Edgar Hoover left. Maybe the next President will find another qualified cross-dresser to take over and save the Bureau.
    MALE OR FEMALE > Sorry, but I still don’t buy it. Just me…just sayin’. If everything is biological and nothing is mental, eventually we’ll no longer be able to hold criminals responsible for their crimes. We have already tested incarcerated violent felons and found them to have, almost universally, very-far-below-normal cholesterol levels. Some medicos see a connection between their metabolism and their behavior. “Your Honor, my hormones and DNA made me do it.” There will always be birth defects, always a teensy-weensy lucky few with confusing bodies and minds, but I can’t help the feeling that the overwhelming majority of transgendered folks are just mental cases who need better shrinks – not drugs and surgeons. Don’t waste your time hitting me with facts, my mind is made up.
    LONDON > Liberalism’s finest hour. Good luck with that.
    WAR ON TERROR > Blah…blah…blah…yada…yada…yada. If The Donald is elected, watch out – here we come -and this time no more Mr. Nice Guy. If Hillary wins, it will be just like it is now – endless war, and the violence that happened in Paris, Brussels, and now Munich, will be every-day news. Note: If one, just one, of the sainted Syrian refugees Obama is eagerly resettling in American cities goes “jihad,” Trump wins in a landslide.

    1. Right now, I’m just going to tackle one:
      “Note: If one, just one, of the sainted Syrian refugees Obama is eagerly resettling in American cities goes “jihad,” Trump wins in a landslide.”

      First, that’s a moot point for one very simple reason: The process to resettle ANY Syrian refugee takes at least 18 months so even the first Syrian refugee wouldn’t be here on our soil until AFTER THE ELECTION. (Btw, you sure jumped on the Trump bandwagon fast!)

      Second, I seriously doubt that Trump will come even close to any “win.” All the polls show that EITHER Clinton OR Sanders would win against a Trump nominee — and even more so after Trump picks some loser as his VP) (everyone he’s even considering).

      And “landslide”? You mean, of course, Sanders/Clinton would win in any landslide. And it’s being rumored right now that Clinton just may select Sanders as her VP if she wins the nomination. And if Sanders wins, he’s considering Warren as a possible VP.

  3. re: London first EU capitol to elect muslim mayor
    “In his victory speech, he referred to his humble origins on a council estate and said he had never imagined that ‘someone like me could be elected as mayor of London,’ promising to be a mayor ‘for all Londoners’.”

    I wonder just how he intends to be promising to be a mayor ‘for all Londoners’? What about the atheist Londoners? There are over a dozen “scriptures(suras)” in the qu’ran stating that “good muslims [i.e., devout]” are supposed to kill the infidels. By the very definition of that insidious “religion,” he is a LIAR.

    If he doesn’t agree with those “scriptures,” then he’s a liar toward his own religion and to himself.

    1. The Koran permits the believer to lie to infidels to avoid persecution or if it furthers the faith. See verse 2:26. There are several others.

      1. horsey:
        “The Koran permits the believer to lie [commonly known as al-Taqiyya] to infidels to avoid persecution or if it furthers the faith.”

        So, just because the LIES further their faith, you’re fine with that and you seriously think that’s a “good thing”? Which btw, is what ALL religions do to “survive.”

        Also, you still didn’t address how this London mayor is going to “serve” the huge number of London atheists. Ahh, but you don’t give a damn about (in London as well as the rest of England) what is probably the majority of citizens.

        Your morals are clearly out of whack with a touch of mental illness.

        1. Hold on there my cocksucking-cumguzzling friend, I never said deliberate Muslim dishonesty was a good thing. I was just explaining how and why they lie. The one true God, who is not Allah, teaches me that I shall not bear false witness, for that alone I declare the entire Koran to be heretical, and all of its adherents blasphemers and apostates.

          I had no intention of addressing how Khan will serve the atheists of London. Not my monkeys, not my circus. Read my original post, all I offered was a sarcastic “good luck” to one and all. My guess is he will do what he can to insure regular trash pickup, fill in the potholes, keep the buses, subways, police and fire departments running, and so forth. What else can, or should, any Mayor anywhere really do?

          Britain is our finest ally, as we are theirs, as such I care deeply for the well-being of the kingdom. BTW, Happy 90th Birthday to Her Majesty, may she live forever. E II R

          I am a bit concerned that the alleged ties Khan has to Islamism and Jihadists might be real, he certainly bears watching.

      2. horsey:

        With that one post, you demonstrated just exactly how religion warps a brain. Where to begin? My entire post was criticizing this muslim mayor about “serving the atheist citizens” and how religions survive ONLY BY LYING.

        Sarcastic? Hardly. It was actually a rare truth by you (even if you “think” you were being sarcastic) … it’s just that you attempt to differenciate between islam/qu’ran and christianity/bible when there is no differnce with regard to LYING.

        “I had no intention of addressing how Khan will serve the atheists of London.”

        Then why did you respond? You just confirmed exactly what I said: “Ahh, but you don’t give a damn about (in London as well as the rest of England) what is probably the majority of citizens” with YOUR statement: “Not my monkeys, not my circus.” You provide that response and nearly in the same breath you state how British & we are the best of friends? With “friends” like you, who needs ISIS?

        “I never said deliberate Muslim dishonesty was a good thing. I was just explaining how and why they lixe.” But, christianity dishonesty IS a good thing?

        “The one true God, who is not Allah, teaches me that I shall not bear false witness,”

        Newsflash: They’re the SAME “god,” because islam was founded on christianity which was founded on judaism. Each one added or changed the characters to suit their particular fable. Btw, ALL 3 were founded on paganism. And “bearing false witness?” You seem to LIVE FALSE WITNESS because there is NO “god” and the proof of that begins at Genesis 1:1.

        “I am a bit concerned that the alleged ties Khan has to Islamism and Jihadists might be real, he certainly bears watching.”

        Concerned for what/who, exactly? You seem to be concerned ONLY for christianity, not the good citizens of London (and all of Great Britain), certainly NOT the atheist citizens of London (which the majority are probably atheist, unlike in the USA).

        And, with respect to my comments, who gives a damn about the Queen?

        “My guess is he will do what he can to insure regular trash pickup, fill in the potholes, keep the buses, subways, police and fire departments running, and so forth.”

        A mayor has next to nothing to do with any of those services — it’s taken care of by the municipal government (whatever it’s called in England) bureaucrats. S/he only appoints the top “manager” of those departments.

        1. As much as we can criticize Islam or Christianity or any other religion, let us not forget that they are rapidly being replaced by Feminism which is a religion, too (and it survives by lying, also).

  4. My dearest Penboy, While reading your rant I could not help conjuring up a vision of you typing it. The rage, the frothing at the mouth, the swirling clouds of dystopia coursing to and fro between your ears. I even saw your joy – that snarky smile as your trembling fingers poured out your anger to this poor, religiously warped brain of mine. You should’ve seen yourself. Quite a sight to behold. Please, my friend, be careful – when you get like that, you might hurt yourself. Chill.

    1. That’s quite “cute” ….. when you can’t argue substance, you resort to pathetic silliness.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *